Popular history in early modern London: the role of history in the creation of identity amongst Londoners 1580-1640
This study explores whether a shared knowledge and understanding of elements of London’s past
helped to create a sense of identity amongst those who lived in the city in the late sixteenth and
early seventeenth centuries. It suggests that a shared knowledge of London’s history and the
associated values this inculcated, created a sense of common identity amongst Londoners, and this
was one way in which social cohesion and thus stability was maintained in the city.
The elements of history most popular in early modern London were initially identified using ballads
and almanacs, the cheapest, most numerous forms of print in the city. These sources suggest that
London’s topography, civic government and famous figures from the city’s past were the topics
Londoners were most interested in and frequently encountered. These topics appeared not only in
ballads and almanacs, but were ubiquitous in chronicles, plays, pageants and other texts,
suggesting the majority of those living in London acquired a familiarity with them.
These themes were popular for a range of reasons. Information on them was readily available, the
values they embodied met with approval from the civic elite, and there were individual elements of
each which were clearly appealing to Londoners for a range of reasons. This study considers the
impact that exposure to these stories and themes had on early modern Londoners, with the values
promoted by these popular historical topics creating a sense of shared identity amongst Londoners
and enabling them to acclimatise themselves to the urban environment.
This study concludes that alongside the social utility of the individual topics assessed, the fact that
this selected knowledge of London’s past was shared amongst most Londoners, who may have
shared little else, was a factor enhancing social cohesion within the city.
https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/52479/10.18743/PUB.00052479
https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/52479/1/Kent